« God in the Gallery, Art Criticism, and the Christian Tradition, Part II. | Main | Art and Knowledge, or Philosophizing with a Spoon »

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00e55444e7d288330112790cc86128a4

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Lenten Painting:

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Mike

Excellent post. I like how you've captured the "dual nature" of Lent and seen it in this man's art.

Bruce herman

"True art, like true life, is found in fasting. "

Having read your entries for Studio Practice I & II, and just now reading your "Lenten Painting" entry, I'm reminded of a statement Steiner made in REAL PRESENCES (paraphrased): "it takes an uncanny degree of abstention to read the world as it is, and not as it has been previously encoded for us."

Of course, the self-denial implied in this call to purity may be actually impossible to achieve in real terms (yet the attempt may be the whole point). This makes me wonder (even as I did while reading God in the Gallery) if the modern notion of the artist as free agent constitutes a fundamental teleological confusion. Like Steiner's gamble on transcendence accomplished by resisting the "previous encoding" (that, incidentally, is also free from the contagion of secondary critical literature), this may result from an inflated notion of the role or purpose of art, locating it in a supposedly autonomous relation to the rest of human life and action. A sort of Promethean "originality"...

This seems to me to be part of the inheritance of Romanticism and its imagined freedom from convention or religious constraint.
In certain ways, the liberation of art from its more utilitarian status in former eras has been a terrible loss -- both for artist and for art -- in that the telos of art, by being freed from its servant posture has taken an impossible trajectory. The landscape of modernism is littered with the corpses of casualties from this forced heroic role. (Pollock and Rothko come to mind in their search for purity and self-actualization.) On the other hand, this very loss may be the occasion for a refreshing of the tradition because of the radical experimentation that this autonomy has afforded. But I can't help but feel the weight of melancholy that attends the very real economic manipulation that resulted from the mythos created around these men -- and the meaninglessness that threatens the whole enterprise of radical autonomy.

Your call for artists of Christian faith and Christian educational venues to serve as a place of refreshment and equipping for a lofty calling of art and artist is compelling, and I'd like to think with you more about this. Yet I confess that the older I get, the more I question the hyperbole and the rhetoric of transcendence and the more I look for a simple honest day's work. Less self-invention and more humble craft.

I think Shakespeare, Bach, Rembrandt, and Dante would hardly recognize the status accorded the arts in our rhetoric -- and likewise they'd be struck with the ironic loss of funding that accompanies this state of affairs. Perhaps there is an inverse relationship between the rhetoric of autonomy and money. I guess its really only common sense: if you insist on utter artistic freedom, you're then set free -- economically as well as artistically. You earn your freedom and literally work yourself out of a job.

That's where the machinery of commercial mystique must be invented to keep the artist financially solvent. (Or its alternative in the academic ecosystem of art.) All that said, I resonate with your hunch that Christians may actually be able to offer something in this next era, and my own hunch that it must be issued as an invitation to "dine" -- a kind of artistic and intellectual hospitality in which the guests are our secular neighbors (from whom we can learn a lot -- just as we do when we entertain angels).

daniel a. siedell

These are helpful observations. Anyone working as an artist today, anyone who has a BFA and an MFA, is participating in the living tradition of modern artistic practice. There are certainly options available for an artist to make work in a more artisan-like way, especially for Roman Catholics who make liturgical furniture and Eastern Orthodox who make icons. For the rest, various myths of the modern artist, including transcendence, freedom, etc. can be believed or disbelieved in varying degrees. But such belief or disbelief of those myths take place within the tradition of modern artistic practice. It is possible that many modern cultural practices, art among them, are in various ways impoverished, including the practice of Christianity.

I like the image of dining.

Bruce herman

Right. Point taken about the "living tradition of modern artistic practice". The infrastructure of modern art practice supplies, in a way, the patronage that supports the practices. My concern above is more about the inheritance of Romanticism -- which amounts almost to an entire weltanschauung. It's influence may in fact be inescapable -- but I honestly think we need to resist it -- as forcefully as the anti-war generation of the 1960's resisted corrupt authority. Resisting radical autonomy causes sparks because it is the cultural bedrock with which we work. To imagine a way of recovering a sense of answerability to the "dead poets" (vis. Eliot) seems to me to be essential in a time where mere novelty passes for authentic newness. And this seem to be the result of the narcissism of radical artistic autonomy.

ben malick

Great to hear your thoughts on art and faith Dan. I enjoyed this interview you recently did with one of my professors, Dr. Paul L. Metzger, here at Multnomah Biblical Seminary in Portland, Oregon.

http://new-wineskins.org/blog/

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

December 2009

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
    1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31